exatorrent: Elegant self-hostable torrent client. confluence: torrent client as a HTTP service. There are several web-frontends, sites, Android clients and supporting services among the known public projects: is interviewed about this repo in Console 32. There are some small examples in the package documentation. Install the library package with go get /anacrolix/torrent, or the provided cmds with go install Library examples Some noteworthy package dependencies that can be used for other purposes include: You can write your own to store data for example on S3, or in a database. There are several data storage backends provided: blob, file, bolt, mmap, and sqlite, to name a few. There is support for protocol encryption, DHT, PEX, uTP, and various extensions. This is also demonstrated through torrentfs. To this end it supports seeking, readaheads and other features exposing torrents and their files with the various Go idiomatic io package interfaces. The implementation was specifically created to explore Go's concurrency capabilities, and to include the ability to stream data directly from the BitTorrent network. It's been used 24/7 in production by downstream services since late 2014. The emphasis is on use as a library from other projects. This repository implements BitTorrent-related packages and command-line utilities in Go. Is it right for Google to downrank or outright censor torrent links to legit,non-infringing content on (or any other site), just because copyright holders havespammed a million 'valid' DMCA notices on our other pages to Google that hasn't been countered?Censorship will never be easier, by DMCA spam.The media conglomerates failed to pass SOPA, now they are getting in bed with Youtube at thepublic's expense.(cl) AddTorrentInfoHashWithStorage(infoHash, specStorage) (ours was electronic by email years ago I might add, whenGoogle was still requiring snail mail) And contrary to popular beliefs, we have plenty oftorrent links toand we'll be addingfrom thesoon. Wehave ourand takedown process, like Google. Is what Google/Youtube routinely call valid takedowns valid,likebefore? (although to Google's credit, a video of ais too good to takedown, unlike a video from Mars)To complicate matters, we are also a search engine, like Google, not just a regular website. Not any more valid than how Youtube took downjust because a broadcaster said so. 
That does not mean all links under which Google has filtered by notices arevalid, just because we haven't countered them.
0 kommentar(er)
